Cycling computers are getting inexplicably big – how did it come to this?

by December 11, 2024

written by December 11, 2024

This article is part of a series called ‘A love letter to…’, where Cycling Weekly writers pour praise – or criticism – on their favourite or least favourite aspects of cycling. The below content is unfiltered, authentic and has not been paid for.

I used to work in a branch of EE, selling people phones and dealing with upgrade issues. I wasn’t a very good salesman, as I was too honest and struggled to even try to get people to buy things they didn’t need.

The rage back then, in 2014/15, seemingly, was bigger and bigger phones. The iPhone 6 was the first to come in a “Plus” size, at a scarcely-holdable 16cm x 8cm, while the Samsung Galaxy Note 4 came in at 15cm x 8cm with a stylus, such was its size. Thankfully, for our wallets and our pocket sizes, the huge phone didn’t really catch on – while phones are still big, it was accepted that most of us wanted to be able to hold them in one hand, and put them in our pockets.

Ten years on, and it seems like the world of bike computers is similarly hooked on the idea that the bigger the better. It started, as it often does in the world of bike tech, with Garmin, who introduced the Edge 1000 about a decade ago, but in the intervening years, other brands have got in on the act. Hammerhead and its Karoo range are great examples of bike computers that are essentially phones, they even run Android, such is their high-tech nature. Garmin is now onto the 1050, which measures 12cm x 6cm, getting closer to a mobile.

Simply, I don’t really understand why I need a huge bike computer. For routes, my Bolt – 5cm x 8 cm – is big enough to see where I’m going, and all the data fields are easily visible. The battery life is as good as it needs to be, and it’s also negligible in terms of weight added to my bike. If you were someone who needed a bigger screen – perhaps more of an off-road rider, with more exact plotted routes in confusing areas – the mid-sized Elemnt Roam is already there, ready to purchase. The Ace seems, to me anyway, to be a new device that I would never need, and I thought this of the 1050 and the Karoo 2, too.

I appreciate that for some, a bigger screen is needed, perhaps because of eyesight, but the line now feels blurred between big bike computers and small phones. What’s stopping people getting a second-hand phone to just use for mapping, rather than a potentially more expensive – and limited – computer? It’d almost certainly be cheaper than the Ace’s £549.99, and you could play Candy Crush on it, too.

Source link

Cycling computers are getting inexplicably big – how did it come to this?

Rockets GM Stone says, ‘I would be shocked’ if team made major deadline trade

Noè Ponti Blasts 50 Fly World Record In 21.32 En-Route To gold

You may also like

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply